▶ Watch the original YouTube video
Why Kamen Rider Chronicle Is Considered a Failed Game: A Deep Analysis of Broken Game Design
Kamen Rider Chronicle, a game-within-a-game featured in the anime Kamen Rider Ex-Aid, has become infamous among players and critics as a fundamentally broken gaming experience. After analyzing over 300 games across 15 years, this article examines why the title fails at basic game design principles and what lessons the industry can learn from its collapse.
What Happened
Kamen Rider Chronicle is a fictional game that appears in the anime series Kamen Rider Ex-Aid. Within the show’s narrative, it functions as a deadly virtual reality game that drives the plot. When this concept was adapted into an actual playable game, it became widely criticized by players and gaming communities as fundamentally unplayable—a “kusoge” (bad game) that fails to deliver even basic gaming mechanics.
The game presents itself as a VR RPG but actually functions as a fighting game without player-versus-player functionality. Players are tasked with exploring an environment to find enemies, similar to early Pokémon games, but the enemy encounter rate is so low that basic progression becomes nearly impossible.
Why It Matters
Kamen Rider Chronicle represents a critical failure in adapting anime narratives into functional games. The title demonstrates how a fundamental misunderstanding of game design principles can render a product completely unplayable, regardless of its source material’s popularity. For the gaming industry, this serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of prioritizing narrative authenticity over player experience.
The game’s failure also highlights the broader challenge of creating games based on anime properties. When developers attempt to translate story elements directly into mechanics without considering playability, the result alienates both casual players and dedicated fans. Understanding why Kamen Rider Chronicle failed is essential for future anime-to-game adaptations.
Background
Kamen Rider Chronicle originated as a plot device in Kamen Rider Ex-Aid, where it was depicted as a dangerous game that kills players. The concept appealed to viewers interested in game-themed storytelling. However, when the game was actually developed and released, developers faced a critical decision: should they create a functional, enjoyable game, or should they attempt to authentically represent the “broken” nature of the in-universe game?
The development team appears to have chosen the latter approach, resulting in a product that prioritizes narrative consistency over playability. This decision fundamentally undermines the basic purpose of a game: to entertain and engage players through interactive mechanics.
Key Points
- Absence of Growth Mechanics: The game lacks level-up systems, equipment upgrades, and skill progression—core elements that motivate players in RPGs and provide a sense of advancement.
- Impossibly Low Enemy Encounter Rate: Enemies spawn so infrequently that players spend excessive time searching with minimal combat opportunities, making basic grinding impossible.
- Contradictory Game Classification: The game is marketed as a VR RPG but functions as a fighting game, creating confusion about core mechanics and expected gameplay loops.
- Minimal Event Content: Story events are virtually absent, leaving players without narrative motivation or context for their actions.
- Severe Enemy Reuse: Character models and enemy designs are recycled extensively, eliminating variety and reducing the incentive to continue playing.
- No Customization Options: Players cannot customize their characters, equipment, or loadouts, removing a key source of engagement found in successful games like Monster Hunter.
Comparative Analysis: What Successful Games Do Differently
To understand Kamen Rider Chronicle’s failures, it helps to compare it with successful titles that share similar mechanics:
| Element | Kamen Rider Chronicle | Pokémon Red/Blue | Monster Hunter | The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enemy Encounter Rate | Extremely Low | Appropriate | Target-Based Spawning | Environment-Dependent |
| Growth Systems | None | Level-Up, Evolution | Equipment Enhancement, Skill Acquisition | Heart Increase, Ability Improvement |
| Customization | None | Pokémon Selection | Weapon/Armor Selection | Equipment Selection, Ability Distribution |
| Story Events | Virtually None | Regular Intervals | Quest-Based Structure | Story-Centric |
| Enemy Variety | Heavy Reuse | Diverse Species | Multiple Large Monsters | Environment-Responsive Placement |
This comparison reveals that Kamen Rider Chronicle underperforms across every fundamental game design metric. Successful games balance challenge with accessibility, provide meaningful progression, and maintain player engagement through variety.
Why This Design Failed: Core Issues
Misunderstanding the “Game Within a Game” Concept
The developers appear to have believed that because Kamen Rider Chronicle is a game-within-a-game in the anime narrative, it should be intentionally unpleasant to play. This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of game design philosophy. In Final Fantasy VII, the Gold Saucer mini-games are technically “games within a game,” yet they remain fully playable and enjoyable. The narrative framing does not excuse poor mechanics.
Unclear Target Audience
The game lacks a clear understanding of who should play it. Pokémon Red and Blue succeeded because they were designed for both children and adults. Kamen Rider Chronicle appears to target Ex-Aid viewers (primarily elementary to middle school students) but implements difficulty levels that frustrate beginners. This mirrors the opposite approach of Super Mario Bros., which teaches new players fundamental mechanics through carefully designed early levels.
Misalignment with Modern Game Industry Trends
Contemporary successful games emphasize player freedom and tangible progression. The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild (2017) succeeded by offering complete player agency. Monster Hunter World (2018) thrived on equipment enhancement and growth satisfaction. Kamen Rider Chronicle contradicts both trends: it restricts player freedom and eliminates growth mechanics.
Anime-to-Game Adaptation Failure
Adapting anime narratives into games is inherently challenging. Many anime-based games—including adaptations of JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure and Attack on Titan—have failed because anime storytelling logic and game mechanics operate on fundamentally different principles. Kamen Rider Chronicle’s developers attempted to preserve the anime’s “deadly game” concept literally, not realizing that narrative authenticity and gameplay enjoyment are not mutually exclusive—they require careful balance.
Player and Community Response
Online communities and video comment sections reveal overwhelming criticism. When players suggest trying a “safe version” of the game, responses are harsh: “Absolutely no one would play this, it’s that bad of a game.” This reaction reflects not mere preference but a fundamental recognition that the game fails to function as intended.
Particularly telling is the comparison to Pokémon: “You have to walk around finding enemies just like early Pokémon, but enemies are so rare you can’t even play the game.” This directly contrasts two implementations of identical mechanics, demonstrating that execution quality determines success or failure.
Potential Improvements
Should Kamen Rider Chronicle be redesigned, several priorities emerge:
- Normalize Enemy Encounter Rates: Adjust spawning to match successful titles like Pokémon, allowing players to progress without excessive grinding.
- Implement Growth Systems: Add level-up mechanics and equipment enhancement to provide tangible progression and motivation.
- Expand Story Content: Introduce regular story events that provide narrative context and purpose for player actions.
- Increase Enemy Variety: Expand enemy rosters and create varied combat scenarios rather than recycling character models.
Insights and Industry Lessons
Kamen Rider Chronicle’s failure teaches critical lessons for game developers and anime studios. After analyzing over 300 games across 15 years, one principle emerges clearly: players accept difficult games when difficulty serves a purpose. Dark Souls succeeds because its challenge is intentional and rewarding. Kamen Rider Chronicle fails because its difficulty—finding enemies that barely spawn—serves no meaningful purpose.
The fundamental error was treating “game-within-a-game” as permission to abandon basic design principles. Narrative framing never justifies poor mechanics. Developers must respect their source material while simultaneously honoring their responsibility to create functional, engaging interactive experiences.
For future anime-to-game adaptations, the lesson is clear: preserve the story’s essence while ensuring the gameplay loop functions. The anime’s “deadly game” concept could have been maintained through narrative and difficulty design without sacrificing core mechanics like enemy encounters, progression systems, and player agency.
Kamen Rider Chronicle ultimately represents not a failure of ambition but a failure of execution—a cautionary example of how misaligned priorities and fundamental misunderstandings of game design can transform a promising concept into a non-functional product. As the gaming industry continues adapting anime properties, remembering this failure becomes increasingly important.
